Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Academy Activities – ADI Reports
Academy Activities- ADI Comments
Academy Activities- ADI Convocations
Academy Activities- ADI Cover story
Academy Activities- ADI International projects
Case Report
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Obituary
Opinion Corner
Opinion Piece Article
Opinion Piece Articles
Original Research Article
Policy Papers
Research Article
Review Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Academy Activities – ADI Reports
Academy Activities- ADI Comments
Academy Activities- ADI Convocations
Academy Activities- ADI Cover story
Academy Activities- ADI International projects
Case Report
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Obituary
Opinion Corner
Opinion Piece Article
Opinion Piece Articles
Original Research Article
Policy Papers
Research Article
Review Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
8 (
2
); 107-110
doi:
10.25259/JGOH_26_2025

From ancient artifacts to modern marvels - A historical journey of Bioceramics in Dentistry

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Baba Jaswant Singh Dental College, Hospital and Research Institute, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Urvashi Saggar, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Baba Jaswant Singh Dental College, Hospital and Research Institute, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. urvashi.saggar1998@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Saggar U, Singh H, Baweja PS, Tandon B, Bhatia S, Rawat G. From ancient artifacts to modern marvels - A historical journey of Bioceramics in Dentistry. J Global Oral Health. 2025;8:107-10. doi: 10.25259/JGOH_26_2025

Abstract

Dentistry has indeed progressed systematically over the centuries, with ongoing innovation driving improvements in patient care, treatment outcomes, and overall oral health. The quest to replace damaged body parts with functional equivalents has been a focus in health sciences. Advances in chemistry, material science, nanotechnology, and bioengineering have led to the development of biomaterials. This review article provides insights into the evolution of bioceramics that are used in the biomedical field as well as in conservative dentistry and endodontics.

Keywords

Bioceramics
Biodentine
Conservative dentistry
Endodontics
Mineral trioxide aggregate

INTRODUCTION

Bioceramics (BCs) are inorganic, non-metallic, biocompatible materials that are applied in direct contact with living tissues in the medical and dental fields.[1] The introduction of BC materials meant a significant advancement for this new paradigm in dentistry due to their biocompatible nature, excellent physicochemical properties and broader area of clinical applications. BCs are developed and tailored based on specific clinical needs and applications, ensuring optimal performance in targeted medical and dental procedures.

The historical perspective of BCs is a fascinating journey that spans centuries and encompasses various civilizations and scientific advancements [Table 1]. Early medical books from the Greek, Egyptian, and Hindu civilizations document man’s endeavor to use implant materials to restore the human body itself. Until the end of the 19th century, heterogeneous grafts were the main biomaterials utilized.[2]

Table 1: Key milestones in the evolution of Bioceramics.
1824 Portland cement, derived from limestone laid the foundation for future developments in ceramic materials
1892 Plaster of Paris, a resorbable ceramic, described for filling bone cavies.
1920s Calcium phosphates were first used as a stimulus for osteogenesis, marking the beginning of their role in bone defect repair.
1950s Ceramic hydroxyapatite (HA) granules reported for bone defect repair demonstrated the potential of ceramics in orthopedics.
1963 Cerosium -a ceramic bone substitute, expanded the range of materials available for bone repair.
1969 Bioglass, a material easily integrated into human bone, paving the way for bioactive ceramics.
1980s Hydroxyapatite-coated implants were marketed, enhancing the biocompatibility and osseointegration of dental implants.
1982 Calcium phosphate was used in restorative dental cement, marking the emergence of Bioceramics in restorative dentistry.
1984 Bioceramics were first used as a root canal sealer, contributing to advancements in endodontic treatments.
1986 The first self-hardening calcium phosphate cements (CPCs) were developed, offering new options for bone defect repair.
1993 Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was developed at Loma Linda University, California, for retrograde filling and perforation repair in endodontics.
1997 Low friction between zirconia and alumina was discovered, leading to advancements in dental implant materials.
1998 TH-Zirconia implants were introduced, enhancing the durability and biocompatibility of dental implants.
1999 ProRoot MTA, the first commercial MTA product, was launched in the United States, revolutionizing endodontic treatments.
Early 2000 Bioceramic Gutta Percha
2001 MTA Angelus, MTA with shorter setting time
2007 iRoot SP injectable root canal sealer
2008 Premixed Bioceramic Products
2009 Biodentine, a calcium silicate-based product, was marketed as a permanent bulk dentin substitute, expanding the options for restorative dentistry.
2010 MTA-Fillapex, a paste/paste Bioceramic root canal sealer, was launched by Angelus, further improving endodontic procedures.
2011 TheraCal LC, used for direct and indirect pulp capping Micromega MTA (MM-MTA)
2014 ApaCal Art, photo cure, resin modified, tricalcium phosphate pulp protectant
2019 Biner LC, light cure Calcium phosphate based cavity liner Bio-C®Temp, a ready-to-use Bioceramic paste for intracanal dressing, is developed by Angelus, offering convenience and efficacy in endodontic treatments.
2022 Bioactive Root Canal Sealer, (SafeEndo) Bioceramic root canal sealer

Archaeological findings suggest that ceramics were used for cranial surgery and dental prostheses as early as 700 BCE. In 1972, Amadeo Bobbio discovered Mayan skulls that were more than 4000 years old and had missing teeth restored with nacre substitutes.[3] In 1824, Portland cement (PC), derived from limestone, was patented, leading to breakthroughs in ceramic materials. It was widely used in civil engineering and had properties such as antibacterial activity, biocompatibility, non-cytotoxicity, good sealability, and favorable physical characteristics, which made it suitable for dental applications involving tissue interaction.[4] Then in 1892, Plaster of Paris, a resorbable ceramic, was described for filling bone cavities. This early use anticipated future applications in bone defect repair, showcasing the early recognition of the potential of ceramics in orthopedics.[5] In the 1920s, calcium phosphates were first employed to stimulate osteogenesis.[6] Ceramic hydroxyapatite (HA) granules were reported to be used for bone defect repair in the 1950s. Tricalcium phosphate (TCP), a biodegradable BC with the chemical formula, Ca3(PO4)2 gets dissolved in physiological media and was used as a replacement for bone during implantation. Mixtures of HA and TCP, known as biphasic calcium phosphate, were also investigated as bone substitutes.[7]

The development of Cerosium in 1963 marked a significant advancement in the field of bone repair and biomaterials. Cerosium, an epoxy resin-coated porous aluminate ceramic, expanded the range of materials available for bone repair, offering new possibilities for orthopedic surgeons and patients alike.[8]

The discovery of Bioglass in 1969 by Hench and his team at the University of Florida revolutionized biomaterials and regenerative medicine. Bioglass forms a strong bond with bone tissue through a process called bioactive bonding. When Bioglass came in contact with bodily fluids, it triggered a series of reactions that resulted in the formation of a layer of hydroxycarbonate apatite on its surface. This layer replicated the mineral structure of bone, facilitating the direct integration of Bioglass with the surrounding bone tissue. The discovery of Bioglass laid the foundation for the development of a wide range of bioactive ceramics and glass-ceramic materials that have since been used in various medical applications, including bone grafts, dental implants, and tissue engineering scaffolds.[9]

In the 1980s, HA-coated implants were introduced to improve their biocompatibility and osseointegration. Coating implants with HA helped to promote better integration with the surrounding bone tissue, leading to improved stability and long-term success rates of the implants. In 1982, the use of calcium phosphate in restorative dental cement led to the development of BCs in dentistry.[10] One of the most widely used synthetic calcium phosphate ceramics in those days was HA, and this was due to its chemical similarities to the inorganic component of hard tissues. The development of BCs offered various materials that can better mimic the properties of natural dental tissues and promote improved clinical outcomes.

Then, in 1984, BCs were introduced as a root canal sealer in endodontic treatments.[11] In 1986, self-hardening calcium phosphate cements (CPCs) were created, providing new possibilities for bone defect repair.

In 1993, another BC material named mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was developed by Loma Linda University in California for retrograde filling and endodontic perforation healing.[12] MTA was acknowledged as a bioactive material known for its ability to conduct and induce hard tissue formation while being biocompatible. MTA was developed in two forms: Gray MTA (GMTA) and white MTA (WMTA). MTA and PC possess similarities in both physical and chemical properties. An evaluation of GMTA and WMTA dry powders, as well as ordinary and white PC, revealed identical primary elements. Tricalcium aluminate, tricalcium silicate, and tetracalcium aluminoferrite, and calcium silicate. The primary differences between both types of MTA and PC are a lack of potassium and the presence of bismuth oxide in the former.[13] In 1997, researchers discovered low friction between zirconia and alumina, which led to advancement in dental implant material.[14] The introduction of THZirconia implants in 1998 improved the biocompatibility and longevity of dental implants.

The first commercially available MTA that has revolutionized the endodontic treatments was the ProRoot MTA, which was launched in the United States in 1999. GMTA presented with the limitation of tooth discoloration, so WMTA, with lower quantities of iron, aluminum, and magnesium oxides, was introduced in 2002. MTA Angelus was introduced in 2001 and approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2011. MTA Angelus offers a reduced setting time and enhanced ease of use, while still maintaining the excellent performance of traditional MTA.[14]

Around the early 2000s, BC gutta-percha (GP) was introduced into endodontics as an alternative to traditional GP for root canal therapy. The EndoSequence BC GP points were impregnated and coated with BC nanoparticles. This formulation aimed to enhance the sealing ability and potentially provide bioactive properties that traditional GP lacks. EndoSequence BC GP points and BC Sealer represented a modern approach to root canal obturation, leveraging BC technology for potentially enhanced sealing and biocompatibility. The promising features provided by BC-coated GP were standardized manufacturing, unique stiffening processes, and monobloc formation but their efficacy and long-term performance require validation through robust scientific studies and clinical trials.[15]

In 2007, Innovative BioCeramix, Inc., based in Vancouver, Canada, developed iRoot SP, which was a premixed, ready-to-use calcium silicate-based root canal sealer. This material is known as iRoot SP injectable root canal sealer.[16] Improvements in the handling properties of ceramic granulates, particularly in dental and biomedical applications, have been significant. The endodontic pre-mixed BC products such as EndoSequence BC Sealer, EndoSequence BC root repair material (RRM), and EndoSequence BC RRM-Fast Set Putty were initially available in North America from Brasseler USA starting from 2008.[17]

Then, more advancements in the calcium silicate-based products were advocated with the introduction of Biodentine in 2009. Biodentine is a calcium-silicate based material that was specifically designed as a “dentine replacement” material.[18] In 2010, Angelus introduced MTA-Fillapex, a paste/paste BC root canal sealer. TheraCal LC was introduced to the market in 2011 as a light-curing resin-modified calcium silicate liner for use in direct and indirect pulp capping procedures.[14] ApaCal Art, launched in 2014 by Prevest DenPro was photo-cure, resin-modified, TCP pulp protectant used in direct and indirect pulp capping, as a protective base/liner under composites, amalgam, and other restorative materials.

MicroMega MTA (France), another formulation of MTA, was developed in 2011 to overcome the drawbacks of the original MTA products. It is an injectable osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and biocompatible tricalcium silicate-based cement and also contains calcium carbonate, which helps in reducing the setting time. Biner LC, a light cure, fluoride releasing, radiopaque cavity liner and base material contains hydroxy calcium phosphate, which was specially formulated for use with adhesives and composites and with conventional restorative materials. Biner LC was introduced in the year 2019.

Angelus developed Bio-C Temp, a ready-to-use BC paste for intracanal dressing that reduced the microbial contamination and promotes the peri-radicular healing in the year 2019. BioActive Root Canal Sealer (RCS), launched by SafeEndo in the year 2022, was a bioactive mineral root canal sealer based on innovative mineral micro-aggregate chemistry “Active Biosilicate Technology” that offers biocompatibility, bioactive properties, alkaline pH, sealing properties, and retreatable.

Despite the existing limitations of current BC materials – such as brittleness, handling difficulties, or slow setting times – ongoing research is focused on enhancing their biological and mechanical properties to expand their clinical applications.

Recent advancements in BCs are revolutionizing dental tissue engineering and regenerative dentistry. Research is advancing with the use of 3D-printed calcium silicate scaffolds for odontogenesis and dentin regeneration. Combining nanostructured BCs with dental stem cells and growth factors aims to regenerate enamel, dentin, and periodontal tissues, offering breakthroughs in restorative dentistry. Incorporating bioactive agents such as fibronectin-like proteins into CPCs enhances interaction with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells, promoting osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration in dental and craniofacial applications.[19]

CONCLUSION

The evolution of BCs has been driven by the quest to develop materials that are compatible with living tissues and capable of promoting healing and regeneration. Today, BCs play a key role in various medical and dental applications, ranging from orthopedic implants to dental restorations. The advancements in BC materials aim to improve the outcomes of root canal therapy by providing enhanced sealing, biocompatibility, and antimicrobial properties.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent was not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , . Induction of osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by bioceramic root repair material. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:2311.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . History of bioceramics. Ceram Int. 1982;8:131-40.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . An introduction to bio-implants and biodegradable materials In: Additive manufacturing of polymers for tissue engineering: Fundamentals, applications, and future advancements. Boca Raton: CRC Press; . p. :41.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Bioceramic in dental implants: A review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010;10:8-12.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. . The use of plaster of Paris to fill defects in bone. Clin Orthop. 1961;21:1-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. . Studies in bone growth: Triple calcium phosphate as a stimulus to osteogenesis. Ann Surg. 1920;71:32-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Bioceramics: Past, present and for the future. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2008;28:1319-27.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. . The use of plaster of Paris to fill large defects in bone. Am J Surg. 1959;97:311-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. . Bioceramics. J Am Ceram Soc. 1998;81:1705-28.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Apatitic calcium phosphates: Possible dental restorative materials. J Dent Res. 1982;61:343.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . A Calcium Phosphate Cement root canal sealer--scanning electron microscopic analysis. J Endod. 1984;10:571-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod. 1993;19:541-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review--Part I: Chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010;36:16-27.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Bioceramics in endodontics: Updates and future perspectives. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023;10:354.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. . Bioceramic materials in endodontics. Endod Top. 2015;32:3-30.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , . The use of premixed bioceramic materials in endodontics. G Ital Endod. 2016;30:70-80.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . Bioactivity potential of endosequence BC RRM putty. J Endod. 2016;42:615-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . A review on biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:160951.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . Bioceramic-based scaffolds with antibacterial function for bone tissue engineering: A review. Bioact Mater. 2022;18:383-98.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
2,604

PDF downloads
10,229
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections