Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Academy Activities – ADI Reports
Academy Activities- ADI Comments
Academy Activities- ADI Convocations
Academy Activities- ADI Cover story
Academy Activities- ADI International projects
Case Report
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Opinion Corner
Opinion Piece Article
Opinion Piece Articles
Original Research Article
Policy Papers
Research Article
Review Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Academy Activities – ADI Reports
Academy Activities- ADI Comments
Academy Activities- ADI Convocations
Academy Activities- ADI Cover story
Academy Activities- ADI International projects
Case Report
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Opinion Corner
Opinion Piece Article
Opinion Piece Articles
Original Research Article
Policy Papers
Research Article
Review Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JGOH_21_2024

Resin infiltration revolution in minimal invasive treatment – A review

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kanti Devi Dental College and Hospital, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Akancha Kumari, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kanti Devi Dental College and Hospital, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India. drakansha821@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Kumari A, Gupta S, Varshney A, Lal N. Resin infiltration revolution in minimal invasive treatment – A review. J Global Oral Health. doi: 10.25259/JGOH_21_2024

Abstract

The concept of the resin infiltration technique emerged for the very 1st time in 1970 for the conservative management of initial smooth surface caries. The precept of resin infiltration is to halt the non-cavitated enamel by obstructing the subsurface porosity with resin, so-called caries infiltration. Infiltration of different types of resins into micropores is based on the approach that it will seal the diffusion pathways in enamel, further preventing demineralization without causing any harm to healthy tooth structure. Treatment of interproximal caries is always considered challenging due to a lack of access and the chances of unintentional removal of noncarious tooth structure. Recently, the introduction of resins on interproximal carious lesions proved that they can penetrate and seal the carious lesion, thus preventing the caries advancement.

Keywords

Incipient caries
Remineralization
Resin Infiltration
Subsurface porosity
White spot lesion

INTRODUCTION

Dental caries is a multifarious, infectious disease with significant factors as host, bacteria, diet, and time. This process increases demineralization and halts the remineralization of hard tissue over time, leading to negative impacts on children’s oral as well as general health.[1] White spot lesions (WSLs), also known as early caries lesions, are the first clinical manifestation of enamel caries, having a demineralized porous subsurface layer with a milky opaque white appearance on a smooth surface.[2] Cavitation is uncommon in early lesions that reach up to the outer half of enamel, that is, E1, but it is likely to occur in lesions that extend into the middle, that is, D2, or inner third, that is, D3, of dentin. For radiolucencies into the outer third of dentin, that is, D1, or inner enamel, that is, E2, uncertainty is common. Therefore, choosing between non-operative and restorative methods at these stages is challenging due to the possibility of either receiving too little or too much treatment.[3] Therefore, there was a requirement for treatment that lies between prevention and restoration. Restorative therapy is invasive, leading to extensive tooth destruction, evokes dental anxiety toward drilling thus leading to evasive behavior in kids.[4] Performing operative procedures during restorative treatment in children is quite effortful to carry out and may call for specialized behavior management techniques.[5] Nowadays, there is a shift in dentistry from an operative to a preventive approach, giving way to non-invasive treatment preventing healthy tooth structure and longer tooth life.[6]

WSLs have various influences such as hypoplastic enamel, initial enamel caries, demineralization due to orthodontic treatment, and fluorosis. Frosted or whitish appearance of enamel is said to be due to a difference in optical density and loss of mineral content from the inner layer or surface of enamel.[2] The treatment of choice for initial caries lesion is remineralization, and remineralization of teeth surface is achieved by various methods, like topical fluoride and casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate application, bleaching of teeth, veneering of teeth having white spots, and microabrasion. Remineralization of tooth structure is an efficient method but has limited cosmetic impact as it is confined only up to the surface of the lesion. Treatment by remineralization is time investing and shows appreciable result if applied once the lesion develops.[5] Microabrasion and bleaching methods may cause post-operative discomfort and have less satisfying esthetic outcomes, whereas veneers are a highly invasive procedure.[7]

To overcome these problems recently, a minimally invasive technique called resin infiltration has been introduced and is intended to fill the gap between restoration and prevention by occluding and strengthening the pores of non-cavitated early caries lesions.[8] The goal behind the introduction of resin infiltration is to stop the early stages of an enamel caries lesion by allowing a low-viscosity resin to penetrate the enamel and block the diffusion paths for dissolved minerals and acids.[9] Resin infiltration proves to be a superior alternative due to its microinvasive property, tooth conservation, arrest of lesion progression, deep occlusion in porous demineralized areas, and ability to be completed in a single visit, thus reducing chairside time. In addition, this technique needs no anesthesia, which makes the treatment needle-free and highly acceptable for children.[10]

Robinson et al., (1976) have among the first to explain the use of resorcinol formaldehyde resin in the infiltration approach for carious lesions.[11] In 2007, in an effort to create the best resins for infiltrating enamel lesions, bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (BISGMA), urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA), triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), and hydroxylethyl methacrylate (HEMA) monomers in various viscosities and weight proportions were examined.[12] In September 2009, Sebastian Paris and Hendrik Meyer-Lueckel from Charité Medical University in Berlin introduced the “infiltrant,” and it was marketed by Dental Milestones Guaranteed (DMG) dental Company in Hamburg, Germany, under the Icon brand that became well-liked for cosmetic reasons.[13] The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, in 2017, considered resin infiltration in its reference manual and came to the recommendation that there was evidence for using RI as a treatment for small, non-cavitated interproximal carious lesions in permanent teeth.[14] In the same year, the American Dental Association (ADA) established a Current Dental Terminology code (D2990) for the use of resin infiltration in smooth surface lesions after obtaining positive research results for this material.[15] In 2018, new guidelines from the ADA recommended the use of resin infiltration for interproximal incipient carious lesions.[16]

Resin infiltration is comprised of the following, according to the manufacturer [Table 1].[17]

Table 1: Composition of resin infiltration
Components of syringe system Active ingredient Weight (%) Function
Hydrochloric acid 15% Removes the surface layer causing deep surface porosities, and enhance penetration of the resin.
Syringe 1
Icon etch (DMG)
Pyrogenic silicic acid Acts as a thickening agent in etchant with a mild abrasive quality.
Surface active substance Helps in lowering surface tension and modifies the morphology of the silicon surface
Syringe 2
Icon Dry (DMG)
Ethanol 99% Lowers surface tension, viscosity, eliminates water inside the microporosity, and enhances resin penetration
Syringe 3
Icon infiltrant (DMG)
Methacrylate based resin matrix, initiators and additives. Increases penetration capability.
Form thick oxygen-inhibited layer leading to chemical connection of the resin infiltrant to the monomers of the primer.

DMG: Dental Milestones Guaranteed

  • Icon resin infiltrant – Smooth surface [Figure 1]

    Smooth icon kit.
    Figure 1:
    Smooth icon kit.

  • Icon resin infiltrant – Interproximal surface [Figure 2].

Proximal icon kit.
Figure 2:
Proximal icon kit.

The idea behind caries arrest with resin infiltration is to clog the micropores developed during the initial caries process and stop further acid dissolution through those micropores. The surface layer of enamel is removed first, as the surface layer of the lesion acts as a barrier to the functioning of resin infiltration.[5] These are low-viscosity TEGDMA-based resins which are light curable and have low viscosity, low contact angles to the enamel, and a high surface tension that helps the resin to completely penetrate the porous lesion by capillary force. In the second step, after application resin infiltrates into the porous enamel and forms a covalently bound three-dimensional polymer framework that replaces the lost minerals, encapsulates the hydroxyapatite crystals, interlocks the remaining enamel prisms by micromechanical bond, and acts as an effective barrier for hydrogen ions [Figure 3]. These hydrogen ions inhibit further demineralization and arrest subsurface lesion progress. In the process of infiltrating the non-cavitated lesion, an additional benefit is seen, that is, masking of the lesion. This masking of the lesion occurs due to negligible variation in the refractive indices between sound enamel (1.62) and resin infiltration (1.46), resulting in less scattering of light.[18]

(a) Initiation of caries by infiltration of acid (H+) of sub-surface porosities (red dots) and leaching of calcium and phosphate ions (yellow lines - dentin, white - enamel, inward arrow - acid infiltration, outward arrow - leaching of calcium and phosphate ions), (b) Post treatment, pores are closed by the occluding resin (green dots), blocking the advancement of caries (green dots -infiltrated resin, revert back yellow arrow - inhibition of infiltration of hydrogen ion). H+: Hydrogen ion, Ca2+: Calcium ion, PO43-: Phosphate ion.
Figure 3:
(a) Initiation of caries by infiltration of acid (H+) of sub-surface porosities (red dots) and leaching of calcium and phosphate ions (yellow lines - dentin, white - enamel, inward arrow - acid infiltration, outward arrow - leaching of calcium and phosphate ions), (b) Post treatment, pores are closed by the occluding resin (green dots), blocking the advancement of caries (green dots -infiltrated resin, revert back yellow arrow - inhibition of infiltration of hydrogen ion). H+: Hydrogen ion, Ca2+: Calcium ion, PO43-: Phosphate ion.

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES

Enamel like optical characteristics lead to improvement of esthetics as the pores of carious lesions are incorporated by water and air having refractive index (RI) of 1 and 1.33 which is closer than that of the surface infiltrated by resin (RI = 1.42–1.44) than healthy enamel (RI = 1.62), which makes this material suitable for masking WSL.[19] Molecular weight is the sum of the atomic weights of all atoms in a molecule. Molecular weight of resin infiltration is lower around 286.32 g/mol due to presence of TEGDMA as a component.[18] Viscosity is a measure of fluid resistance to flow. It is a low viscosity monomer (0.006) at 25°C. The contact angle is the angle between the liquid and the solid surface where they meet. Resin infiltration has a low contact angle to the enamel and high surface tension. These properties help in better penetration of resin into the body of the lesion.[18] Permeability coefficient is the rate at which a fluid can move through a porous material. Permeability coefficient of resin infiltration is 273 cm/s, leading to greater penetration depth. [20] It is the physical property of a molecule that causes it to be insoluble in water. Resin infiltration is a hydrophobic monomer; therefore, application of ethanol prior, improves the efficacy of penetration, forming resin-infiltrated layer. Surface micro-hardness for sound human enamel is 352 Hardness Vickers Number (HVN) and for carious enamel is 0.29–3.29 GPa, while after application of resin infiltration, microhardness ranges between 33 HVN and 0.32 GPa.[21]

FACTORS AFFECTING APPLICATION OF RESIN INFILTRATION

Method of application of resin infiltration has an influential effect on removal of surface layer. In the course of application of acid gel, etching brush applicator removes surface layer 2.7 times greater than sponge applicator, that is, 1.7 times, as mechanical friction caused by the brush applicator is more, and produces significant porous enamel surface.[22] Depth of non-cavitated lesion has a direct impact on penetration of infiltrant. The likelihood of a full infiltration will decrease with the depth of the carious lesion.[23] Isolation of the working field also exerts influence on the penetration of resin infiltration. TEGDMA monomer is an active component of resin infiltration which is hydrophobic in nature; therefore, before application resin infiltration requires complete dry field.[24]

INDICATIONS

  • It is advisable in case of sub-surface or porous lesions of enamel and shows good results up to International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) codes of 2 and 3. These ICDAS codes can be confirmed by an additional detecting tool bitewing radiograph.[25]

  • It is strongly recommended to be used for the treatment of lesions that are present in the inner enamel (E2) or the outer third of dentin (D1).[25]

  • Resin infiltration has the ability to hide discoloration caused by decalcified carious lesions, developmental defects of enamel, and post-orthodontic decalcification spots.[25]

  • Resin infiltration is used widely to mask WSLs in kids, youngsters, and adults of all ages.[10]

CONTRAINDICATIONS

  • Resin infiltration is contraindicated in a few cases as it can be counterproductive and may have minimal benefit even after application. It is not recommended in case of deep-seated lesions of enamel or cavitated enamel due to a negligible masking effect.

  • It should not be used in patients with any known allergy, intolerance to monomer, or any material component.

  • Resin infiltration is not advisable in cases of exposed dentin or cementum surface, as it may lead to pain in the patient by interaction with vital tissues, as well as in severe levels of fluorosis, because it reduces the snow white appearance only to a limited extent.[25]

ADVANTAGES

Resin infiltration, considered as a novel approach toward uncovering new scopes in microinvasive dentistry, offers a number of advantages which make its unique among other restorative materials. It is considered as first intermediate treatment of choice between preventive and restorative therapies, thus leading to preservation and maintenance of sound tooth structure. Resin infiltration mechanically stabilizes demineralized enamel by occluding subsurface porosities permanently. It strengthens the body of the lesion by acidic decalcification and delays restorative intervention for a longer period of time. It leads to easy access to proximal WSL than restoration procedure, thus reduces the risk of periodontitis and gingivitis, as well as lowers down chance of secondary cavities. As this treatment approach is recommended to be used up to the outer layer of dentin, there is no risk of post-operative sensitivity and pulpal irritation. It is user-friendly, convenient with simple application, therefore reducing the chair time. These qualities make resin infiltration a good treatment of choice in children and have high acceptance also. It is highly advised in case of aesthetic concerns, especially for labial surface lesions.[25]

DISADVANTAGES

Resin infiltration has numerous benefits with few disadvantages, like initial lesion conditioning, which is necessary as early caries lesions have a hypermineralized surface layer that prevents resin from penetrating the demineralized area. After application of resin infiltration, it releases unreacted monomers from TEGDMA and which may cause acrylate allergies and allergic contact dermatitis. Dry working field is necessary for better penetration of resin as it is hydrophobic in nature.[25]

Resin infiltration is a successful microinvasive approach, even though some short-term potential drawbacks are addressed. Therefore, recently, superior alternatives are now being tried to overcome these drawbacks. For the infiltration of initial proximal lesions, a new glass-based substance called Wroclaw, Poland, is made up of ethanol and 15% hybrid-glass monomer. This hybrid glass material is a transparent, low viscosity, and inorganic-organic hybrid polymer obtained using the sol-gel technique that self-cures quickly after application. Incorporation of silica core with an organic side chain gives the substance particular qualities. Hybrid-glass-based material is acid resistant. It can create a smooth, glassy surface that reduces plaque accumulation and acts as an effective diffusion barrier.[26]

When nanohydroxyapatite (Sigma-Aldrich) is added to resin in concentrations of 5% and 10%, it has been observed that the artificially created enamel caries surfaces are improved in terms of penetration of resin, smooth surfaces, and mineral density.[27] Colloidal silica infiltrate is used as another alternative to resin infiltration. It is manufactured by Zephyr Chemicals, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, and composed of 29.6 weight percentage suspension of silica in water pH at 25°C, with average particle diameter: 8.3 nm and stabilizing counter ion: Sodium. Colloidal silica nanoparticles exhibit mineralization potential by acting as a scaffold, assisting in the formation of hydroxyapatite crystals, and mineralizing the dentinal collagen matrix at high pH levels. These nanoparticles lower the energy barrier in the collagen’s inter- and intrafibrillar gaps, which ultimately affects the development of inorganic ion clusters. The study showed that colloidal silica nanoparticle-treated demineralized dentin has a significant potential for remineralization, recovering 16% of its mineral volume and restoring over 20% of its phosphate levels.[28]

CONCLUSION

Infiltration of resins into cavitated micropores has created a novel approach in the treatment of early carious lesions, thus meeting the goals to deliver the least invasive esthetic procedure. In the realm of minimally invasive dentistry techniques, the suppression of caries progression through infiltration is currently being investigated as a substitute for more invasive therapies. Resin infiltration technique nowadays is soaring high, as they not only provide esthetic rehabilitation but also arrest lesion progression as well as allow recovery from hypomineralization. Therefore, it is considered an upcoming microinvasive approach for the management of non-cavitated lesions and opens up more research and scopes in microinvasive dentistry.

Ethical approval:

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent was not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , . Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;20:CD007868.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. . Fundamentals of operative dentistry: a contemporary approach (No Title) . p. :1-1136.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Radiographic and observed tissue changes in approximal carious lesions at the time of operative treatment. Caries Res. 1986;20:75-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Update on nonsurgical, ultraconservative approaches to treat effectively non-cavitated caries lesions in permanent teeth. Eur J Dent. 2011;5:229-36.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . The evaluation of resin infiltration for masking labial enamel white spot lesions. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011;21:241-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . A comparison of various minimally invasive techniques for the removal of dental fluorosis stains in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017;35:260-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Color and hardness changes in artificial white spot lesions after resin infiltration. Restor Dent Endod. 2012;37:90-5.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Improved resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res. 2008;87:1112-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Progression of artificial enamel caries lesions after infiltration with experimental light curing resins. Caries Res. 2008;42:117-24.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Effect of fluoride on artificial caries lesion progression and repair in human enamel: Regulation of mineral deposition and dissolution under in vivo-like conditions. Arch Oral Biol. 2007;52:110-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Arrest and control of carious lesions: A study based on preliminary experiments with resorcinol-formaldehyde resin. J Dent Res. 1976;55:812-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Resin infiltration of artificial enamel caries lesions with experimental light curing resins. Dent Mater J. 2007;26:582-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . The influence of resin infiltration system on enamel microhardness and surface roughness: An in vitro study. Saudi Dent J. 2012;24:79-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. . Pediatric restorative dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39:312-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. . American Dental Association CDT-2017 code on dental procedures and nomenclature. Available from: https://www.bcbsri.com/sites/default/files/BCD-Policy-2017FINAL.pdf 1-144, [Last accessed on 2024 May 15]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on nonrestorative treatments for carious lesions: A report from the American dental association. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149:837-49.e19.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. In vitro effects of resin infiltration on enamel erosion inhibition. Oper Dent. 2015;40:492-502.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , . Caries infiltration of noncavitated white spot lesions: A novel approach for immediate esthetic improvement. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012;3:S199-202.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , . Accelerated aging effects on color, microhardness and microstructure of ICON resin infiltration. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23:7722-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . Surface conditioning of natural enamel caries lesions in deciduous teeth in preparation for resin infiltration. J Dent. 2010;38:65-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , . Micro-hardness and mineral loss of enamel lesions after infiltration with various resins: Influence of infiltrant composition and application frequency in vitro. J Dent. 2013;41:543-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . In situ evaluation of different remineralization periods to decrease brushing abrasion of demineralized enamel. Caries Res. 2001;35:216-22.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , . Infiltrants inhibit progression of natural caries lesions in vitro. J Dent Res. 2010;89:1276-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Is resin infiltration a microinvasive approach to white lesions of calcified tooth structures a systemic review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;12:53-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , . Resin infiltration in pediatric dentistry-a review. J Curr Res. 2020;12:15298-304.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. Novel hybrid-glass-based material for infiltration of early caries lesions. Dent Mater. 2022;38:1015-23.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . The impact of nano-hydroxyapatite resin infiltrant on enamel remineralization: An in vitro study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022;42:e43-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , . Effect of CPP-ACPF, resin infiltration, and colloidal silica infiltration on surface microhardness of artificial white spot lesions in primary teeth: An in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2022;19:52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections