Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Academy Activities- ADI Comments
Academy Activities- ADI Convocations
Academy Activities- ADI Cover story
Academy Activities- ADI International projects
Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Opinion Corner
Opinion Piece Article
Opinion Piece Articles
Original Research Article
Policy Papers
Research Article
Review Article
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF
Academy Activities- ADI Cover story
Non Peer-Reviewed Content

Australian study finds warning labels on sugary drinks may deter people from buying them

Department of Internal Medicine, Co-Director, Oral Health Section, Northeast Ohio Medical University, United States
Corresponding author: RL Fulton, Department of Internal Medicine, Co-Director, Oral Health Section, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 1388 Mac Drive, Roots Town, OH, United States. E-mail:
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Appetite. 2018 Sep 1;128:233-241. Doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.149. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

Professor Anna Peeters,, from Australia’s Deakin University presented a ground-breaking study at the European Congress on Obesity in Vienna, Austria, and colleagues on May 25, 2018. The study was entitled: The effect of sugar-sweetened beverage front-of-pack labels on drink selection, health knowledge, and awareness: An online randomized controlled trial.

In the study, Professor Peeters and her colleagues conducted an online choice experiment to examine the drink preferences of almost 1000 Australians aged 18–35 years. They were randomized into one of the five groups and asked to choose one of the 15 drinks, with sugary and non-sweetened options available. Participants were then asked to imagine that they were entering a shop, cafe, or approaching a vending machine to purchase a drink.

The drinks included either a no label (control group) or one of four labels on sugary drinks: (1) A graphic warning; (2) a text warning; (3) sugar information, including the number of teaspoons of added sugar; or (4) a health star rating on all drinks. Alternatively, they could select “no drink” if they no longer wanted to buy a drink.

The results of the study showed that, overall, participants were far less likely to select a sugary drink when a front-of-pack label was displayed compared to no label, regardless of their level of education, age, and socioeconomic background.

Graphic warning labels were displayed on the packaging which indicated that consuming drinks with added sugar may contribute to tooth decay (an image of decayed teeth), type 2 diabetes, or obesity appeared to have the greatest impact.

“The question now is what kind of impact these labels could have on the obesity epidemic. While no single measure will reverse the obesity crisis, given that the largest source of added sugars in our diet comes from sugar-sweetened drinks, that is a compelling case for the introduction of front-of-pack labels on sugary drinks worldwide,” Professor Peeters said.

Pub Med Abstract:

Show Sections