Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Academy Activities – ADI Reports
Academy Activities- ADI Comments
Academy Activities- ADI Convocations
Academy Activities- ADI Cover story
Academy Activities- ADI International projects
Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Opinion Corner
Opinion Piece Article
Opinion Piece Articles
Original Research Article
Policy Papers
Research Article
Review Article
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
5 (
); 46-48

Risk of coronavirus disease 2019 through aerosol generated dental procedures: A brief report

Happy Teeth Dental, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Corresponding author: Avishek Das, Chief consultant, Happy Teeth Dental, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Das A. Risk of coronavirus disease 2019 through aerosol generated dental procedures: A brief report. J Global Oral Health 2022;5:46-8.


A novel human coronavirus – now named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with 80% genetic makeup similarity with SARS-CoV-€1 – emerged from Wuhan, China, in late 2019. This new virus is highly infective especially through airborne transmission. Dentistry has been listed as the very-high-risk category in a new report called “Guidance on preparing workplaces for COVID-19” by occupational safety and health act. This literature review aimed at assembling relevant information regarding the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 through aerosol generated dental procedures.


Coronavirus disease 2019
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2


Since its outbreak by the end of 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affected more than 22 million people so far and has claimed nearly 8 lakh lives worldwide. This new virus, highly infective especially through airborne transmission, is responsible for an acute respiratory syndrome, distinguished by an often asymptomatic, but potentially lethal, interstitial bilateral pneumonia.[1] The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has listed dental care-related aerosols or droplets as high risk on the basis of presumed equivalence of these aerosols to those that might occur during medical procedures.[2] As the oral cavity is the working area of dental professionals, they have a high risk of being infected. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been identified in the saliva of infected patients.[3] The dental aerosols can remain on the surface even after the patient has left the clinic and this can be a potential source of infection for the dental professionals. Although there is no evidence that aerosols generated from dental care lead to transmission of SARS-CoV-2, guidelines have been recommended given the urgency of the epidemic. Typically, the greater the imminent threat to public health, the lower the standards of evidence in early guidance.[4] Furthermore, universal precautions must be considered for all patients because asymptomatic patients can also transmit the virus.[5]


According to size, particles can be classified as: coarse particles (2.5–10 μ), fine particles (<2.5 μ), and ultrafine particles (<0.1 μ). Air particles >10 μ can typically be filtered by human nose, but it usually fails to filter any particle <10 μ from entering into the respiratory system. Furthermore, any fine particle (<2.5 μ) can easily enter the alveoli and any ultrafine particle (<0.1 μ) can enter the bloodstream and target organs such as heart and brain.[6] SARS-CoV-2 virus is an enveloped virus approximately 0.1 μ in diameter. Respiratory droplets are often divided into two size bins, large droplets (>5 μ), and small droplets (<5 μ). Large droplets fall to the ground at a faster pace due to gravitational forces, but small ones can stay suspended in the air for a much longer period of time and be inhaled by susceptible person.[7] The characteristic diameter of large droplets produced by sneezing is approximately 100 μ,[8] while the diameter of droplet nuclei produced by coughing is on the order of ~1 mm.[9] Here are some examples of the longevity of SARS-CoV-2 in various places:[10]

  • Plastic and stainless steel surfaces: 72 h

  • Cardboard surfaces: 24 h

  • Copper surfaces: 9 h

  • Suspended aerosols: 3 h.

The exhalation distances of aerosol micro particles and large droplets are depicted in figure 1.

Figure 1:: Exhalation distances of aerosol microparticles and large droplets. Original picture with data taken from Xie et al.[11]

These bioaerosols that are produced by high speed dental hand piece, ultrasonic scaler, or air-water syringe are comparatively smaller particles (<10 μ) than respiratory droplets.[11] These bioaerosols are contaminated with various microorganisms and have the potential to suspend in the air for a considerable amount of time and be inhaled by the dentists or other patients.[12] Wang et al. (2004) examined the oral cavity of SARS patients and found large amount of SARS-CoV ribonucleic acid in their saliva ([7.08 × 103]–[6.38 × 108] copies/mL).[13] Veena et al. in 2015 demonstrated that contaminated aerosols can be found within 60 cm from the patient’s head, mainly on the right arm of the dentist, on their mask, and around their nose and eyes. Moreover, the aerosol generated by an ultrasonic device can remain suspended in the air for 30 min after the procedure.[14] Incidence of particle transmission is highest during ultrasonic scaling followed by air polishing, air/water syringe, and high-speed hand piece aerosolization.[15] Ultrasonic instrumentation can transmit 100,000 microbes per cubic foot with aerosolization of up to 6', and, if improper air current is present, microbes can last anywhere from 35 min to 17 h.[16] Dentistry has been listed as the very-high-risk category in a new report called “Guidance on preparing workplaces for COVID-19” by occupational safety and health act and the section “Implement workplace controls, engineering controls” recommends that dental practices should install negative pressure rooms or there should be an airborne infection isolation rooms for aerosol producing treatments.[17]


Although there is loads of literature suggesting the possible mode of transmission of COVID-19 through bio-aerosol producing dental procedures, few hidden facts are needed to be addressed. First, it has still not been established whether dental aerosols are similar to those produced during tracheal and nasopharyngeal procedures.[18] Aerosol is produced in dental procedures due to water or air spray, which would considerably dilute any potential viral presence. Second, there is question of presence of potential infectious virus within dental aerosols. Viral culture is necessary to substantiate the potential for infection, as demonstrated in investigations of other body sites.[10,19,20] Finally , there is lack of evidence of transmission of infectious respiratory disease through aerosol producing dental treatments. CDC guidance has suggested that SARS-CoV-2 spreads from person to person, and spread through contaminated surfaces is not the main way of virus transmission.[21] Moreover, risk assessment aerosols and contaminated surface must be based on isolation of viable virions, not only on polymerase chain reaction testing.


The aim of this review of literature was to assemble all relevant facts in the dental field since the emergence of the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. The extent and severity of changes of infection control procedures in post-pandemic dental practice should be guided by evidences and researches.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


  1. , , , , , . Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. Int J Oral Sci. 2020;12:9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. . Guidance for Dental Settings. Interim Infection Prevention and Control Guidance for Dental Settings during the COVID-19 Response. . Available from: [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 30]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Consistent detection of 2019 novel Coronavirus in saliva. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:841-3.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Natural history of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:885-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Transmission of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contact in Germany. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:970-1.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , . COVID-19 and the Problem with Dental Aerosols United States: Perio-Implant Advisory; .
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Transmission routes of respiratory viruses among humans. Curr Opin Virol. 2018;28:142-51.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Characterizations of particle size distribution of the droplets exhaled by sneeze. J R Soc Interface. 2013;10:20130560.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . The size and concentration of droplets generated by coughing in human subjects. J Aerosol Med. 2007;20:484-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1564-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . How far droplets can move in indoor environments-revisiting the wells evaporation-falling curve. Indoor Air. 2007;17:211-25.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. . Quantitative analysis of bacterial aerosols in two different dental clinic environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:3165-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Detection of SARS-associated Coronavirus in throat wash and saliva in early diagnosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1213-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Dissemination of aerosol and splatter during ultrasonic scaling: A pilot study. J Infect Public Health. 2015;8:260-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , . Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: A brief review of the literature and infection control implications. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:429-37.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. . Characteristics of blood-containing aerosols generated by common powered dental instruments. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1995;56:670-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. . US Department of Labor. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. . Available from: [Last accessed on 2020 Nov 17]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , . Should governments continue lockdown to slow the spread of COVID-19? BMJ. 2020;369:m1924.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Airborne transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 to healthcare workers: A narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:1086-95.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . Viral load of SARSCoV-2 in clinical samples. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:411-2.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. . How COVID-19 Spreads. . Available from: [Last accessed on 2020 Jun 23]
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections